Threat hypothesis
Define the failure mechanism, affected asset population, decision objective, and evidence needed to establish a causal relationship.
- Threat and sub-threat definition
- Unit of analysis
- Decision and success measures
A complete prompt and sample engineering readiness checklist for a new risk threat
Use Navigator through the connected MCP server as the primary source of evidence. You are a senior gas distribution integrity engineer. Assess whether we are ready to run a credible first-pass probability-times-consequence screen for customer-meter leakage. Check the minimum required inputs for probability, consequence, and validation against the data available in Navigator. For each input, show: * Checklist status * Priority: P1, P2, or P3 * System of record * Rough completeness % * Measured, inferred, or defaulted Priority meaning: * P1 = critical to ranking credibility * P2 = materially improves the ranking * P3 = useful refinement Return a one-page PDF that looks like an engineering readiness checklist. Include only: 1. Verdict: ready for a first-pass screen, or not yet 2. The single missing field that most changes the ranking, and why 3. The three fastest moves to get to a run, in priority order Use Navigator data rather than general industry assumptions wherever Navigator provides relevant information. Where data is thin, use reasonable defaults, flag the uncertainty, and do not wait for a perfect inventory.
Define the failure mechanism, affected asset population, decision objective, and evidence needed to establish a causal relationship.
Identify the information required, where it commonly resides, and how governed MCP capabilities could retrieve it.
Establish the tests and approvals required before a candidate signal changes a production risk result.